Search for: "State v. Patten"
Results 21 - 40
of 125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2007, 8:37 pm
Van Patten v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
Patten LJ has an enormous amount of ground clearing to do on estoppel by acquiescence and does it with some aplomb. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
Patten LJ has an enormous amount of ground clearing to do on estoppel by acquiescence and does it with some aplomb. [read post]
20 May 2013, 9:33 am
Patten. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:32 am
Then, following Lord Reid in Wickman v Schuler [1974] AC 235, the Court “is entitled to prefer the construction which is more consistent with business common sense” – even if this means an element of judicial creativity, which Patten LJ in the Court of Appeal felt unable to do. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:59 am
See Landrigan v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 12:58 pm
(Evans v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:01 am
James School v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:16 am
Lord Wilson noted that there is evidence of extensive torture by state forces in Sri Lanka at the relevant time. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 1:23 am
I mentioned yesterday the new case in the High Court of England and Wales regarding software patents, Symbian Ltd v Comptroller General Of Patents. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 4:55 am
In considering the appeal, Lord Justice Patten examined many other apportionment methods that had been substantiated by ECJ case law: The “direct and immediate link” test (C-4/94 BLP Group v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1995] STC 424). [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:13 am
Patten J opined that it was not, and the Court of Appeals agrees. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm
Patten are now posted on the First Amendment Library. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 4:46 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 3:35 pm
In Wright v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 8:14 am
AND LUCY PATTEN DAVIS FOUNDATION AND AMY DAVIS, Individually v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:22 am
Aisling O’Dwyer, an associate in the IP team and Ella Wells, a trainee patent attorney at CMS, comment on the decision which is awaited in the matter of Shanks v Unilever Plc & Ors. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 9:33 am
If, however, there is some doubt about whether the actual form of compound claimed would result from the described process, it needs to be determined whether following the process would inevitably arrive at the claimed compound.This was the situation in Leo Pharma v Sandoz EWCA Civ 1188, which was decided by Lords Justice Jacob and Patten yesterday (17 November), on appeal from Floyd J's decision in the High Court earlier this year ([2009] EWHC 996 (Pat)). [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:46 am
The Court of Appeal have refused permission to appeal in Brent LBC v Stokes [2010] EWCA Civ 626 (not on Baili yet) - we reported the High Court judgment here, which contains the summary of the facts and the important decision of King J. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:46 am
The Court of Appeal have refused permission to appeal in Brent LBC v Stokes [2010] EWCA Civ 626 (not on Baili yet) - we reported the High Court judgment here, which contains the summary of the facts and the important decision of King J. [read post]
