Search for: "State v. Philipps" Results 1 - 20 of 171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2021, 9:00 am by centerforartlaw
A high-profile Nazi-era restitution claim has been making waves since the United States Supreme Court issued its decision on February 3, 2021.[1] Known commonly as the Guelph Treasure or Welfenschatz case, Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 12:00 am by D Daniel Sokol
Philipp Werner, Jones Day has written on HSH Nordbank v Commission: Action for Annulment by Minority Shareholders Against State Aid Decisions Approving Aid in the Form of a Capital Increase. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am by centerforartlaw
So this was different from the troop of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, looting during the 16th century. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:44 pm
The articles by Jean-Philippe Robé, Paddy Ireland, Ronen Palan, Elsa Peskine and Stéphane Vernac, Guter Teubner, Jean de Munck, Véonique Champeil-Desplats, Larry Catá Backer, Aontoine Lyon-Caen, Tatiana Sachs, Charley Hannoun, and Christian Chavagneux move us toward a better understanding of thw multi corporate enterprise in the globalized world in which it now operates. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 3:29 am by Philippe Laurent
by Philippe Laurent The CJEU’s ruling in the Scarlet v. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 4:33 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Sean William Kane, Making Peace When the Whole World Has Come to Fight: The Mediation of Internationalized Civil Wars Tamer Morris, State Responsibility and Accountability in UN Peacekeeping: The Case of The Mothers of Srebrenica v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:49 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Pollack, The Road Not Taken: Comparative International Judicial Dissent International DecisionsGeir Ulfstein, Qatar v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 11:53 am by South Florida Lawyers
Day, a United States Federal holiday.BTW, that's called Monday in Arizona. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm by Donald Thompson
 Affirming the Third Department’s holding, the Court of Appeals held that “this case is not akin to Guzman where the prospective juror confirmed that a sign language interpreter would allow him to follow the proceedings verbatim,” since in Guay, no alternative accommodations were requested or discussed (People v Guay, 18 NY3d 16, 23 [2011]).Along these lines, the Fourth Department noted that “[i]t is well established that ‘[a] juror who has not heard all… [read post]