Search for: "State v. Phillips" Results 401 - 420 of 2,873
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2009, 2:37 pm
Spagone (which was dismissed upon motion of the United States), and the cases that have been dismissed as improvidently granted (Phillip Morris v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
Phillip Randolph Institute, in which the justices will decide “whether Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted was correct in his decision to cancel the voting registrations of those who had failed to vote during a two-year period. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 150358 (ED CA, Oct. 18, 2013), a California federal magistrate judge allowed an Orthodox Jewish inmate to proceed with his complaint that it took 147 days before he was furnished with kosher meals.In Phillips v. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am by INFORRM
The case will be heard by a 5 judge bench consisting of Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
As such, “tribes possess the common-law immunity traditionally enjoyed by sovereign powers” (Oneida Indian Nation v Phillips, 981 F3d 157, 170 [2d Cir]). [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:38 am by MBettman
  On January 25, 2013, he dissented from the order of execution in the case of State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
  Lords Phillips and Clarke felt they could, and that a broad and progressive interpretation should be applied to strip states of immunity for executory as well as adjudicatory proceedings. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 11:53 am by Chepenik Trushin LLP
The Southern District of Florida discussed the issue of personal jurisdiction over a party when dealing with an in-state trust and an out of state beneficiary in Abromats v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:15 am by INFORRM
In his judgment Lord Phillips explored the purpose of the words of limitation used in the Act. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 2:09 pm
Recently, our firm sought and obtained summary judgment on wage and hour issues in the employment law case, Alladin v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 4:45 am by Gene Quinn
In a nutshell, these new rules change existing practice by allowing new testimonial evidence to be submitted with a patent owner’s preliminary response, adding a Rule 11-type certification for papers filed in a proceeding, allowing a claim construction approach that emulates the approach used by a district court following Phillips v. [read post]