Search for: "State v. Phillips"
Results 441 - 460
of 2,617
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2019, 5:55 pm
Dow Jr. wrote in an Oct. 9 memo in Timber Hill LLC v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 8:04 am
, v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 8:43 am
This year, the gathering of industry compliance and legal professionals heard the usual updates on CFTC enforcement actions and NFA regulatory matters, but also had the opportunity to learn about the intersection of antitrust and derivatives law, ethical issues implicated in regulatory investigations, and lessons on aggressive courtroom tactics from a lawyer who took on the DOJ in United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 8:30 am
Phillips v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 10:05 pm
Phillips v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 3:45 pm
The New York City sexual harassment attorneys at Phillips & Associates advocate for the rights of employees, former employees, and job applicants, representing them in claims for sexual harassment and other violations of city, state, and federal law. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 8:13 pm
White and Oncale v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 11:25 am
Here is the abstract: In United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 3:03 pm
20 Sep 2019, 4:54 pm
The DOL, for example, cites Hosanna-Tabor and Burwell v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:25 am
Accordingly, the portion of the first cause of action in the original verified complaint that alleges a section 487 violation fails to state a cause of action under the statute (see CPLR 3211 [a] [7]). [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
(See e.g., Leff v Fulbright & aworski, L.L.P., 78 AD3d 531, 533 [1st Dept 2010], lv denied 17 NY3d 705 [2011] [damages in malpractice case “grossly speculative” where plaintiff could not establish what would have occurred but for defendants’ conduct]; Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Grp. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:25 pm
” Hines v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 5:25 am
Phillips & Associates’ New York City employment discrimination attorneys handle EEOC representation matters, helping workers assert their rights under city, state, and federal law. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am
Aidan O’Neill QC argues that following the case of Andy Wightman MSP and others v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU it is clear that the Article 50 notification can be withdrawn at any time. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 5:41 pm
’”Phillips, 415 F.3d at 1312 (quoting Innova/Pure Water,Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 10:43 am
In Champion v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm
Judge Rosenbluth noted that without the latter, posting of property alone would have been inadequate.[6] The Court cited Wright v Henkel for the proposition that pretrial release in foreign extradition cases is generally not appropriate.[7] However, Wright v Henkel is also known for having created the judicial concept of “special circumstances. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm
Judge Rosenbluth noted that without the latter, posting of property alone would have been inadequate.[6] The Court cited Wright v Henkel for the proposition that pretrial release in foreign extradition cases is generally not appropriate.[7] However, Wright v Henkel is also known for having created the judicial concept of “special circumstances. [read post]
