Search for: "State v. Pinch"
Results 101 - 120
of 202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2013, 8:26 am
At the Apple v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:29 am
No trade dress this time.This first Apple v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 6:47 am
Last December, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a first Office action tentatively rejecting all claims of the "Steve Jobs patent", U.S. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:54 am
No. 880, at 10 (ordering evidentiary sanctions after Samsung failed to comply with a Court-ordered deadline to produce financial documents, despite having 'unequivocally stated' to the Court that it had ''agreed to produce all of the financial information' that Apple requested' by the deadline); (4) delaying disclosure of liability theories, Dkt. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 10:34 am
Judge Posner, who is out promoting his 40th book, reflected in the interview [see around 8:45-10:45] on his opinion in Crawford v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:44 pm
Chemical weapons, it seemed, had been consigned to the dustbin of history, no matter the stockpiles that states continued to hold, especially in the Middle East, right up to today. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 9:34 pm
On Thursday evening local time, Judge Lucy Koh, the federal judge presiding over two Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 1:54 am
Case No. 12-cv-00630 (second Apple v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 7:03 am
It was just probabilistic.Apple's July 2011 assertion of the '129 patent against HTC in Delaware never came to judgment because the parties settled before anything significant happened in court.Other reexaminations and reexamination requests involving Apple patents-in-suitThese two patents are just the latest Apple patents to have given rise to reexamination requests:In late July 2013 the USPTO issued a final (but not really final) rejection of all claims of Apple's pinch-to-zoom API patent… [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 2:41 am
Also, I believe that the patents at issue in the second Apple v. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 3:02 am
What about a shove, kick or pinch? [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 2:49 am
On November 12, 2013, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is scheduled to commence a limited damages retrial in the first Apple v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 9:53 am
A week ago the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in a snowplow patent case, Douglas Dynamics, LLC v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:58 am
If so, is this state of affairs desirable or does it require correction? [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 1:46 pm
Based on current schedules, there will be two Apple v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 6:03 am
Apple says that damages-only retrials, such as in Uniloc v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 7:20 am
The orders I granted in Dramatico v Sky are likely to have been less easy to circumvent than the original order made in 20C Fox v BT (No 2) [...]. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 2:49 pm
By Jason Rantanen Rexnord Industries, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:32 pm
The outcome in Rexnord v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 3:08 pm
In the case of People v. [read post]
