Search for: "State v. Plante"
Results 121 - 140
of 4,535
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2023, 4:57 pm
The United States District Court for the District of Delaware granted plant’s motion to dismiss, 2021 WL 7209363, and plaintiff appealed. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 11:42 am
Malone v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:53 am
In People v Hutt, the defendant refused to let medical personnel draw his blood and refused to provide a urine sample despite a warrant authorizing these samples. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
State regulators and plant operators have additional compliance options to meet the emission limits. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 7:51 am
In fact, the authors of this article are aware of only one such decision, in which they participated — Schaeffer v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am
Next, Ramos v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am
Next, Ramos v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 8:15 am
BONUS 3: Reeves v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:53 am
Nor is there any reference whatsoever to West Virginia v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 7:45 am
With regards generation shifting, states will have greater latitude than the federal government to force dirty power plants to close. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
" (Hugh Hall Campbell, KC v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 8:56 am
In Biden v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court’s May 2023 decision in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Polansky v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Polansky v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:51 pm
The post Case Review – Bird Construction Group v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Federal and state rules already require reporting of most Scope 1 emissions, including the pollution from power plants that are others’ Scope 2 emissions. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 7:09 am
ML Genius v. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 4:55 pm
District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Field played pivotal roles through their anti-disqualification decisions, including Cummings v. [read post]
