Search for: "State v. Poland" Results 441 - 460 of 620
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2010, 3:09 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Geo Networks Ltd v The Bridgewater Canal Co Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 1348 (30 November 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) K, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 3102 (Admin) (29 November 2010) Michael, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 3026 (Admin) (05 November 2010) Kownacki, R (on the application of) v District… [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 2:13 am
 Tell that to the European Court of Justice in Case C-487/07 L'Oreal v Bellure, as criticised by the referring court here. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am by Kelly
Roof Security (EPLAW) Miffy miffed by Cathy – Kitty the kopy kat’s friend (IP Factor) Norway Topshop trouble in Norway (Class 46) Poland GUCCI v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by Kelly
XX v HMRC (IP finance) United States US Patents  ‘Sub-standard’ patents cost the US economy over $25 billion a year. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Loosely related state law claims sufficient for supplemental jurisdiction: Von Holdt v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 5:31 am by NL
There was in any event no reference to Art 12 in the annex to the derogation in Poland's treaty of accession. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 5:31 am by NL
There was in any event no reference to Art 12 in the annex to the derogation in Poland's treaty of accession. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:19 am by INFORRM
The hearing in the important media privacy case of Von Hannover and Springer v Germany is due to take place at 9.15am today in Strasbourg before a Grand Chamber of the Court of Human Rights. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 11:10 pm by Kelly
Now we know, it’s a myth (IPKat) United States US General Are you small, American, IP-ish and in business? [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am by Kelly
Ambu AS (Patently-O) CAFC: Preamble held not limiting because body of claim sets forth complete invention: American Medical Systems v Biolitec (Filewrapper) District Court E D Michigan: General allegations of deceptive intent fail to state a claim for false marking: Josephs v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 1:35 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Baxter v Mannion [2010] EWCA Civ 1013 (12 August 2010) EO, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 1009 (17 August 2010) YM (Eritrea) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 1007 (19 August 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) JSC BTA Bank v Mukhtar Ablyazov & Ors [2010] EWHC 2219 (QB) (24 August 2010) High Court (Chancery… [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm by Kelly
KG v OHIM (IPKat) AG supports AB InBev’s case in BUD appeal: Anheuser-Busch v Bud? [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 9:26 am by Larry Siems, The Torture Report
Cassard stated that there were still four detainees that the ICRC had not been able to visit. [read post]