Search for: "State v. Porter Superior Court" Results 21 - 40 of 77
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
  Porter’s statement of claim was lodged with the federal court. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:19 pm by Kerry Shapiro
On December 18, 2020, the Sacramento County Superior Court prohibited the State Water Resources Control Board (“SWRCB”) from implementing California’s new wetlands and “waters of the state” protection program, and limited SWRCB’s application of the regulatory program to only waters already protected under the federal Clean Water Act. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice handed down judgment in the case of R v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am by John Elwood
Superior Court, alleging that Simberg’s and Steyn’s commentary defamed him. [read post]
  Sweeney subsequently initiated two separate actions challenging the orders in Solano County Superior Court. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am by Margaret Taylor
If a court finds McGahn does not enjoy testimonial immunity, it is virtually assured that neither Dearborn, nor Porter, nor Hicks would either. [read post]
7 May 2019, 2:27 pm by Ad Law Defense
  That was one of the questions posed to a Utah jury in Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 5:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court has recently agreed to resolve this matter, in the case of Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 1:08 pm
Superior Court (2000) 22 Cal.4th 245, 253, fn. 2; Greyhound Corp. v. [read post]