Search for: "State v. Pratt" Results 201 - 220 of 248
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Prosecutors and FBI agents have at least twice this year interviewed Anthony Pratt, who runs one of the world’s largest packaging companies. [read post]
25 May 2020, 5:17 pm by Peter Mahler
The Company The above-described scenario played out in a lawsuit captioned Magarik v Kraus USA, Inc. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
” The bill follows the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Pratt, No. 06-2287 An appeal from a conviction and sentence pursuant to a guilty plea to three counts of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to import marijuana, and to commit money laundering is dismissed as barred by the waiver of appeal to which he consented in his plea agreement. . [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:08 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Code § 5412, was not presented at trial can be found in the Noteworthy Panel Decision (NPD) of Raymond Craig Penrose v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Ten years later, the 118th Congress includes five Indian Americans; nearly 50 are in state Legislatures. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm by Howard Knopf
-        York also brought in the well-known barrister Guy Pratte for the oral argument. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
6 May 2014, 7:27 am by Joy Waltemath
The defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law was denied, but its motion for new trial or remittitur was granted in part and denied in part; the court determined the compensatory and punitive damages awards were excessive (Fulmore v M & M Transport Services, Inc, April 29, 2014, Pratt, T). [read post]