Search for: "State v. Privat" Results 1 - 20 of 33,062
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2019, 8:42 am by Steven D. Schwinn
Hyatt that states enjoy sovereign immunity from private suits in the courts of other states. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 6:21 pm by constitutional lawblogger
In an order Friday, Judge Jackie Fulord held unconstitutional a statute ordering the privatization of 29 South Florida prisons in Baiardi v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:00 am by Paul Caron
The Case for Letting States Experiment With Private Sector Retirement Savings Plans: The U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
State’s removing a private lawsuit from State court to Federal court waives a State’s 11thAmendment immunity but may not affect its general sovereign immunity Beaulieu v State of Vermont, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, Docket #13-4198-cv704 current and former employees of the State of Vermont [Plaintiffs], brought an action in State court contending that because their weekly pay is or was reduced for… [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:02 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Here is a bit more explanation of the odd case of Robertson v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 3:30 am by Caprice Roberts
Continue reading "Private State Actions to Disgorge the Wrongful Gains of Insider Trading"The post Private State Actions to Disgorge the Wrongful Gains of Insider Trading appeared first on Jotwell. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 2:33 am
Regina (F) v Secretary of State for Justice Regina (Thompson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Queen’s Bench “In the absence of any mechanism for review, placing an offender on the sex offenders register indefinitely was a disproportionate interference with the right to respect for private and family life. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:31 am by Sandy
The Second Circuit, in M.F. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 1:50 am
VW (Uganda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; AB (Somalia) v Same [2009] EWCA Civ 5; [2009] WLR (D) 7 “If removal from, or refusal of admission to, the United Kingdom pursuant to lawful immigration controls were to be held a disproportionate interference with private or family life under art 8 of the Convention [...] [read post]