Search for: "State v. Quilling"
Results 141 - 160
of 236
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2015, 12:38 pm
First in line this year is OBB Personenverkehr AG v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In Cruzan v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 7:16 am
The retailers argued that the statute violates the Commerce Clause; they said it is nothing more than a device to avoid the Supreme Court’s holding in Quill v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:33 pm
In 1992, Quill v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 10:03 am
The state requires taxpayer self-reporting because the Supreme Court held, in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 3:30 am
A notable exception was the Court’s 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:06 am
From the legal perspective, that threat drew a lot of support from the Court’s 1992 Commerce Clause holding in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 6:19 am
” Alluding to Hamdan v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:24 am
Expect quills at dawn. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 10:12 am
Under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
Then along comes CSX Transportation v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:58 pm
In 1992, the Supreme Court of the United States heard a case called Quill v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:00 pm
Other states in similar cases have found that the physical presence requirement in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:53 pm
Supreme Court decision in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:42 am
The Court’s refusal on Monday to hear two new cases challenging state taxes on Internet-only sales followed a pattern in recent years, in which the Court has refused repeatedly to reconsider or to further clarify its famous 1992 decision in Quill Corp., v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 9:44 am
The brief was filed in State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:00 am
Richard Thompson Ainsworth (Boston University) & Boryana Madzharova (University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Department of Economics), Leveling the International Playing Field with the Marketplace Fairness Act; Quill v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:01 am
” Three years later, in Back to the Internet Taxation Future, reacting to a reappearance of the proposal to permit state 1 to require retailers in state 2 with no state 1 connection to be taxed by state 1, I explained why progress had not been made, pointing out the inability of legislators and others to distinguish between sales and use taxes, the silliness of claims that internet retailers are not required to collect sales taxes at all for any… [read post]
7 May 2013, 10:45 am
The legislation seeks to reverse the decision of Quill Corp. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 10:02 am
By Eric Goldman In the 1992 case Quill v. [read post]
