Search for: "State v. Race"
Results 41 - 60
of 9,566
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm
However, these challenges are limited in number and cannot be used to discriminate based on race, ethnicity, or sex, as established by the Batson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm
However, these challenges are limited in number and cannot be used to discriminate based on race, ethnicity, or sex, as established by the Batson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:39 am
More than two decades after the shock of Bush v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 8:49 am
Supreme Court decision updated the federal religious accommodation test in Groff v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 4:30 am
The Supreme Court addressed that issue yesterday in Muldrow v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm
Here is the abstract: What does Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 10:31 am
(Race Discrimination; Section 1981; Peyote) Conway v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
A year ago, almost to the day, my (co-authored) Verdict column focused on the lessons to be learned from a high-profile and boisterous protest by Stanford Law School students at a Federalist Society Speaker Event featuring Judge Kyle Duncan, a conservative Trump-appointed judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:55 pm
Here is the abstract: An assumption that dominates the discourse on race in the United States is that racial subjugation is only harmful to the subjugated. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
See Bart v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
DIP Financing Key Terms Tracker State Law Comparison Tool for ABCs Subchapter V Decision Tracker Watch and learn from our collection of 750 videos, gathered conveniently in the new Practice Videos Resource Kit . [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
While Custodia is subject to state prudential regulation, it is not FDIC-insured or subject to federal prudential regulation and does not have a holding company subject to Federal Reserve oversight. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:32 am
Since its troubling nineteenth-century origins in Kagama v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 10:57 am
McCommons v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:56 pm
Proc. 97-35, and cases like RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 1:36 pm
” Jack Healy and Kellen Browning of The New York Times report that “Arizona Reinstates 160-Year-Old Abortion Ban; The state’s highest court said the law, moribund for decades under Roe v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
Supreme Court case (Haaland v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
DIP Financing Key Terms Tracker State Law Comparison Tool for ABCs Mega Chapter 11 Filings Tracker Subchapter V Decision Tracker Watch and learn from our collection of 750 videos, gathered conveniently in the new Practice Videos Resource Kit . [read post]
