Search for: "State v. Radcliffe" Results 41 - 60 of 69
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2012, 2:18 pm by Betsy McKenzie
Supreme Court decision, Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
United States: A couple from Texas have been awarded $13.8 million in a defamation case against anonymous posters on the internet forum Topix.com, who had accused them of being sexual deviants, molesters, and drug dealers reports ABC News. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am by INFORRM
Available at SSRN. ‘Here and Now: UK hyperlocal media today’ by Damian Radcliffe for NESTA [PDF] In the Courts As noted above, on Monday 26 March 2012, Bean J gave judgment in the “Twitter libel” case of Cairns v Modi and awarded the claimant £90,000 in damages. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:25 am by Ronald Collins
Madison, the seminal case which established judicial review, to the recent District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 10:51 am by Schachtman
(June 14, 1991) (presented by plaintiffs’ counsel Jim Pettit, of Greitzer & Locks), in Radcliff v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
  In 1948 Lord Reid (formerly James Reid KC), and in 1949 Lord Radcliffe (formerly Cyril Radcliffe KC) were both made Lords of Appeal in Ordinary without previously serving as judges, and both went on to make famous contributions to English common law. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:26 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Highlighting today's top 10, we have some engaging employment law posts from Rob Radcliff, Robin Shea and Tom Crane. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 6:25 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
 Similarly condemning non-transparent, non-consensual stopping of life support is a recent case from the John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford, England. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Orin Kerr: internal v. external perspectives. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:29 am by @ErikJHeels
Syndicate, The (West Springfield, MA) B&V Cab, Inc. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:26 am by Jon Hyman
Right now, your search capabilities are limited to division and state. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am by Dave
In a careful judgment in the CA, Patten LJ separated out the defences, pointing out that, although similar, they were rather different partly because laches would not necessarily have prevented the Claimants from pursuing the claim because of the inaction of their predecessors in title (although that would have been put into the mix, citing Nwakobi v Nzekwu [1964] 1 WLR 1019, 1024, Viscount Radcliffe). [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am by Dave
In a careful judgment in the CA, Patten LJ separated out the defences, pointing out that, although similar, they were rather different partly because laches would not necessarily have prevented the Claimants from pursuing the claim because of the inaction of their predecessors in title (although that would have been put into the mix, citing Nwakobi v Nzekwu [1964] 1 WLR 1019, 1024, Viscount Radcliffe). [read post]