Search for: "State v. Reddy"
Results 41 - 60
of 217
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2022, 4:58 am
Defendants Osborne Reed & Burke, LLP, Bressler & Kunze, Burke Albright Harter & Reddy, LLP and Moyer Russi & Randall, PC (hereinafter collectively referred to as the law firms) respectively moved pre-answer to dismiss the complaint against them as time-barred and for failure to state a cause of action (see CPLR 3211 [a] [5], [7]). [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 12:56 pm
Meland v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 5:37 am
U.S. v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 2:02 pm
Reddy's:For the reasons stated above, we reverse the districtcourt’s [D NJ] determination that the asserted claims of the ’907and ’285 patents are not invalid for lack of an adequatewritten description. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:21 am
The Ninth Circuit’s ruling in City of Oakland v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:21 pm
V. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
However, opined the court, “an award will not be overturned unless the award violates a strong public policy, is totally irrational or exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power” and that the grounds for vacating an arbitration award are narrowly construed.With respect to vacating an arbitration award on the grounds that it violates strong public policy, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Reddy v Schaffer, 123 AD3d 935, said that a… [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
However, opined the court, “an award will not be overturned unless the award violates a strong public policy, is totally irrational or exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power” and that the grounds for vacating an arbitration award are narrowly construed.With respect to vacating an arbitration award on the grounds that it violates strong public policy, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Reddy v Schaffer, 123 AD3d 935, said that a… [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 5:57 pm
Genzyme Corp. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 7:06 am
Garg v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 2:58 pm
Familiar examples, to name just a few, include Justice Harlan's famous dissenting opinion in Plessy v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 4:14 am
Vedam v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 11:20 am
Reddy’s, Teva, and Alvogen Pine Brook. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 10:02 am
No problem, here is the 124th edition of Never Too Early For Christmas References Never Too Late.Festive Feline Level 100Rocket in the Patents Court: Napp Pharmaceutical v Dr Reddy's and SandozThe case of Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited v (1) Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Limited (2) Sandoz Limited [2016] EWCA Civ 1053 was previously reported on the IPKat here (first instance) and here (interim application). [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:09 am
Links to each brief are below. 10:00 AM – Docket no. 644, 2010 Reddy v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 12:50 pm
.* When its comes to "deadwood", leave it in the State of South Dakota and out of Trademark Office policyIs unused "deadwood"really cluttering up trade mark registers? [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 11:30 am
Prem Reddy. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 7:20 pm
McNulty v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 2:56 am
In that regard reliance may be placed on a Full Bench judgment of this Court rendered in the case of State of Punjab v. [read post]
