Search for: "State v. Reddy"
Results 61 - 80
of 216
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2017, 9:56 am
Reddy’s Laboratories (UK) v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 9:10 am
Sandoz focussed on “proportionality” and in particular the importance of the Court including consideration of “whether the injunction was proportionate and a legitimate barrier to trade”, citing Napp v Dr Reddy’s [2016] EWHC 1517 (Pat) and C-494/15 Tommy Hilfiger. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:35 am
I BREAKING: Unanimous Supreme Court in Samsung v Apple finds that damages may be based on a component, not whole product I Will Iceland's EU trade mark end up on ice? [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 10:02 am
No problem, here is the 124th edition of Never Too Early For Christmas References Never Too Late.Festive Feline Level 100Rocket in the Patents Court: Napp Pharmaceutical v Dr Reddy's and SandozThe case of Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited v (1) Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Limited (2) Sandoz Limited [2016] EWCA Civ 1053 was previously reported on the IPKat here (first instance) and here (interim application). [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 9:03 am
Readers of this Blog are no doubt familiar with United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 12:00 am
The case of Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited v (1) Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Limited (2) Sandoz Limited [2016] EWCA Civ 1053 is a welcome reminder that the English Patents Court and Court of Appeal can, when required, deliver swift justice in a way that would be the envy of many IP Courts the world over. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 3:36 pm
Thankfully, GuestKat Eibhlin Vardy will soon be reporting on the Court of Appeal's decision in Napp v Dr Reddy where the Court upheld Mr Justice Arnold's construction (see the first instance report by wonderful Kat friend Amy Crouch here). [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:55 am
Reddy, 620 F.2d 885, 889 (C.C.P.A. 1980). [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 2:04 am
| Weekly roundup: Friday Fun Never too late 107 [week ending on Sunday 31 July] Article 28 declarations |Costs of ISP blocking injunctions |Friday Fantasies, featuring legal challenges to Brexit and more |Huawei v Samsung |Hospira v Genentech |Questions on Article 3(b) SPC referred to CJEU |Book Review: Trade Secret Protection |Pokémon GoNever too late 106 [week ending on Sunday 24 July] |… [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 12:50 pm
.* When its comes to "deadwood", leave it in the State of South Dakota and out of Trademark Office policyIs unused "deadwood"really cluttering up trade mark registers? [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:22 am
At the end of last month Mr Justice Arnold handed down not one, but two decisions in the Napp v Dr Reddy's and Sandoz dispute (see previous Kat report here). [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 9:59 pm
"Another MP, Shri Mekpati Raja Ram Mohan Reddy (Nellore) wanted the Bill to apply even to pending “cases where the arbitrator is already appointed” (p. 158).Importantly, the Minister of Law and Justice stated (at p. 190): “One of the suggestions was that it should have retrospective effect. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 9:59 pm
"Another MP, Shri Mekpati Raja Ram Mohan Reddy (Nellore) wanted the Bill to apply even to pending “cases where the arbitrator is already appointed” (p. 158).Importantly, the Minister of Law and Justice stated (at p. 190): “One of the suggestions was that it should have retrospective effect. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:14 am
” The Labour Appeal Court then went on to cite the Edcon v Pillemer judgment stating that: “It is however always better if such evidence is led by people who are in a position to testify to such breakdown. [read post]
4 May 2016, 4:14 am
Vedam v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 4:06 am
Reddy's and Teva (as extensively covered by Patently-O) interprets AIA prior art provisions to overrule the venerable Metalizing Engineering Co. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
| Napp v Dr Reddy's and Sandoz.Never too late 86 [week ending on Sunday 6 March] – Comic Enterprises Ltd v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation [2016] EWCA Civ 41 | The IPKat team: news, new arrivals and farewells | CJEU in Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v Adidas and OHIM | World IP day | Advocate General's opinion in Henrik Saugmandsgaard Øe in Austro-Mechana | EPO v trade union |… [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:23 am
Do Italians really got what sharing services among EU Member States is about, she wonders? [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 6:01 am
Even more so, when the email attaches a judgment that is short and easily digestible, as was the case in Mr Justice Arnold's decision in Napp v Dr Reddy's and Sandoz [2016] EWHC 493. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 3:56 am
Reddy’s and Teva, Civ. [read post]
