Search for: "State v. Ricci"
Results 41 - 60
of 266
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2015, 1:52 pm
Rejecting the plaintiff’s argument that the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Ricci v DeStefano [92 EPD ¶43,602] controlled it’s analysis of the case, the appeals court found that the challenged plan was valid and that the plaintiff failed to establish that the Department’s justifications for the plan were pretextual (Shea v Kerry, August 7, 2015, 99 EPD ¶45,366). [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 5:00 am
Abstract below: At least since the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Ricci v. [read post]
Symposium: The Supreme Court recognizes but limits disparate impact in its Fair Housing Act decision
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
” Adopting the position articulated in Justice Scalia’s concurrence in Ricci v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:56 am
Ricci v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
A few weeks ago, the New York Court of Appeals became the first State supreme court to expressly import Ricci v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:22 am
In 2009, Justice Scalia wrote a concurring opinion in Ricci v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:22 am
In 2009, Justice Scalia wrote a concurring opinion in Ricci v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 6:31 am
Supreme Court issued its decision in Ricci v DeStefano, ruling that “before an employer can engage in intentional discrimination for the asserted purpose of avoiding or remedying an unintentional disparate impact, the employer must have a strong basis in evidence to believe it will be subject to disparate-impact liability if it fails to take the race-conscious, discriminatory action. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 1:09 pm
The title of this post comes from this paper by Professor Reva Siegel, the abstract of which states: Ricci v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:57 pm
This is a claim articulated most fully (so far) by Justice Scalia in his brief concurrence in Ricci v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 7:08 am
Although opponents of disparate impact focus on Justice Scalia’s concurrence in Ricci v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 11:52 am
As Justice Scalia said in Ricci v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:04 am
Ricci’s parents were ordered to pay their daughter’s tuition at Gloucester County College, a public State school, provided Ms. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 10:57 am
In Abdul-Aziz v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 9:30 am
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
On April 29, 2014, the United States Supreme Court issued opinions in both Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:38 am
Dukes, 131 S.Ct. 2541 (2011), did not compel full decertification of the class; and (3) that the BOE’s defense grounded in the Supreme Court’s decision in Ricci v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 5:51 pm
In Ricci v. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 12:35 pm
Ricci, A. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 4:40 am
" A short time later the United States Supreme Court decided Ricci v DeStefano (557 US 557), holding that, "before an employer can engage in intentional discrimination for the asserted purpose of avoiding or remedying an unintentional disparate impact, the employer must have a strong basis in evidence to believe it will be subject to disparate-impact liability if it fails to take the race-conscious discriminatory action. [read post]
