Search for: "State v. Risk" Results 61 - 80 of 31,574
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2016, 2:16 am by Nicki Milionis
A recent case from the Supreme Court of Queensland (Beven v Brisbane Youth Service Inc [2016] QSC 163) again illustrates the importance of managing risks to psychological health and risks of occupational violence. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 3:08 am by michael
Regina (Oakes) v Secretary of State for Justice and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1169; [2010] WLR(D) 267 “The different wording of the tests to be applied when considering the suitability for automatic release of a prisoner who had been recalled to prison for breaching the terms of his licence, under ss 255A(5) and 255C(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (as inserted by section 29(2) of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008) was deliberate. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Remarkably, there are state and federal court judges who continue to misunderstand and misinterpret regulatory risk assessments, notwithstanding efforts to educate the judiciary. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:10 am by Lyle Denniston
The consensus: it will be about the chance that Roe v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:44 am by Katy Sheridan
The Secretary of State maintained that the Supreme Court decisions in R (Unison) v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 1:51 am
AS and DD (Libya) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 289; [2008] WLR (D) 104 “In order to show strong grounds for believing that a foreign national if deported would face a real risk of being subjected to torture or inhuman or degrading treatment in breach of art 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms it was necessary to produce evidence, not mere speculation, to establish that risk.… [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:52 pm by Bexis
United States, 306 F.3d 938, 947-48 (9th Cir. 2002); and Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. [read post]