Search for: "State v. Rosen" Results 61 - 80 of 836
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2024, 6:56 am by Dennis Crouch
The Federal Circuit is hearing oral arguments today in the design patent case of  LKQ Corporation v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 10:25 am by NCC Staff
  Her organization, NFIB, was involved in litigation against the Affordable Care Act, in NFIB v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 5:10 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Gunning[Affirmed; Rosen; April 19, 2019]Improper admission of other bad acts evidenceStatutory speedy trial violationState v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 11:25 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Davis[Affirmed; Rosen; February 28, 2020]First-degree premeditated and second-degree murder are identical offensesImproper admission of prior bad act evidenceFailure to give lesser-included offense instructionState v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 2:55 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Kerns[Affirmed; Rosen; June 26, 2015]Insufficient evidence of element of arsonArson statute is unconstitutionally vagueProsecutorial misconductImproper admission of hearsay [read post]
In a one-two punch illustrating the continuing vigor of the presumption against extraterritoriality, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, on consecutive days last week, issued important decisions applying Morrison v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 7:59 am by Allison Trzop
” At The Originalism Blog, Chris Green discusses whether the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group has standing to defend the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 6:14 am by NCC Staff
Current President Donald Trump is now part of the case, called Smith v. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 11:46 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Schirer[Reversed/remanded; Rosen; April 19, 2019]Failure to give self-defense instructionDecember 14--Friday--a.m.State v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:20 am by Rosalind English
The enforcement of dignity Rosen also questions the state’s role in protecting our dignity. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:14 am by Amy Howe
Amy Dillard discusses Hall v. [read post]