Search for: "State v. Ruiz"
Results 161 - 180
of 484
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm
General Martins begins by calling Judge Pohl’s attention to the ‘ten-category framework’ from his 2014 discovery order in United States v. al Nashiri. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:33 pm
To support this position, Ryan cites an Eighth Circuit case, United States v Barrow, in which the court required a “deficiency in appointed counsel’s representation,” rather than simple “unwillingness … to communicate with counsel,” as well as the arguably similar cases of Stenson v Lambert and Hunter v Delo. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Regular in-state purchases insufficient.Rawlins v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 11:14 am
The government characterizes it as a factual question—one that (a) the military commission should answer in the first instance (which is why it argues for Councilman abstention), and (b) that can and should be made now in retrospect about the state of affairs in 2000. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 7:30 am
Criminal procedure — Error coram nobis — Need for a hearing In 2006, appellant, Constantino Ruiz, a native of Peru and lawful permanent resident of the United States, pleaded guilty to fourth degree sexual offense and bond jumping in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 7:26 am
In Teva Pharmaceutical Industries v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 8:28 am
” United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 9:36 am
Ruiz, Fla: Dist. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 8:20 pm
The main case she cited was United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
Balam-Ruiz v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 11:56 am
However, at the hearing, respondent, citing Matter of Ruiz v MVAIC (19 AD2d 832 [2d Dept 1963]) and Byrd v Johnson (60 AD2d 900 [2d Dept 1978]) and their progeny, argued further that, even if the court is satisfied that petitioner has otherwise complied with subdivision (b) of section 5218 of the Insurance Law, petitioner, in order to satisfy the "reasonable efforts" requirement of subdivision (b) (5), must first exhaust his remedy and conclude a subdivision (c)… [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:56 am
However, at the hearing, respondent, citing Matter of Ruiz v MVAIC (19 AD2d 832 [2d Dept 1963]) and Byrd v Johnson (60 AD2d 900 [2d Dept 1978]) and their progeny, argued further that, even if the court is satisfied that petitioner has otherwise complied with subdivision (b) of section 5218 of the Insurance Law, petitioner, in order to satisfy the “reasonable efforts” requirement of subdivision (b) (5), must first exhaust his remedy and conclude a subdivision… [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 8:36 am
”Ruiz v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 6:06 pm
Ruiz, 710 F.3d 1077 (9th Cir. 2013), United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:33 am
Ruiz was the state's key witness at trial. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 10:28 am
Ruiz asked him if he had ever been arrested and he stated he had. [read post]
21 May 2015, 12:50 am
Cogliati-Bantz, Archipelagic States and the new Law of the Sea Antonio Remiro- Brotons, About the Islands Agustín Blanco-Bazán, Coastal and flag States in situations of distress at sea giving rise to environmental damage Nilufer Oral, Law of the sea, naval blockades and freedom of navigation in the aftermath of Gaza Flotilla incident of 31 May 2010 Roberto Virzo, Les compétences de l’Etat côtier en matière de sécurité… [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 7:03 pm
(Castor Ruiz, 2010) PS. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:45 pm
Thus, the Excessive Fines Clause is violated where the fine is “grossly disproportional to the gravity of [the) offense” (United States v Bajakajlan, 524 US 321, 334 [1998]; see Canavan, 1 NY3d at 140). [read post]
