Search for: "State v. Russell Council Judge"
Results 61 - 80
of 126
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2013, 12:56 pm
Kevin Russell has our coverage. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the FCC’s rules, and then denied rehearing en banc over the dissents of Judge Janice Rodgers Brown and then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm
On the same day judgment was handed down in the case of R (on the application of Jefferies & Ors) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2018] EWHC 3239 (Admin). [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 7:17 am
X, R (on the application of) v General Medical Council [2011] EWHC 3271 (Admin) (09 December 2011) December 9, 2011 Decision of General Medical Council to refer to doctor’s severe depression in public decision was unlawful. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am
At the Penn Journal on Regulation’s Regulatory Review, Sarah Paoletti maintains that “[d]ue to th[is term’s] ruling [in Jennings v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
United States, 12-10591, involving the dispute between Judges Wilkinson and Posner over what “sexual activity” means for the crime of enticing a minor, the Justices said “Aw, Fugit” and moved on. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am
The High Court found that the English Court had no jurisdiction to hear the case, and held that even if it had jurisdiction, the judge would have [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:07 pm
Charles Russell, Update on Defamation Act: Website Operators [pdf] “Splendid Isolation? [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
California State Council of Carpenters (1983) has standing to sue under federal antitrust laws. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am
Natural Resources Defense Council commands that a reviewing judge defer to an agency’s interpretation of a statute the agency administers if (1) the statutory provision at issue is ambiguous and (2) the agency’s interpretation is reasonable. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
The Council stated that the 60-day trial was intended to “keep residents safe” and will not be implemented without further consultation. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Visciotti and its progeny, by finding a state court’s application of Beck v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am
Jay J granted summary judgment to the claimants, Russell Brand and Jemima Goldsmith. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 10:32 am
Pereira v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm
United States, 11-10835, was put on hold to allow a Fourth Circuit case, Shrader v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
Note: Goldstein, Howe & Russell represent the petitioner.Title: Allshouse v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:05 pm
Opinion below (2d Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Supplemental brief for petitioners Second supplemental brief for petitioners Amicus brief of the United States Case(s) involving lawyers from Akin Gump or Howe & Russell (listed without regard to likelihood of being granted): Docket: 09-102 Title: Virginia v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
The story was judged to be inaccurate by IPSO, and a further correction has been requested. [read post]
