Search for: "State v. SP" Results 61 - 80 of 241
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2023, 2:57 am by Matrix Law
Lifestyle Equities C.V. and another v Ahmed and another, heard 20th February 2023 JTI POLSKA Sp. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
See Standard & Poor Indices, S&P 500, available at http://www.standardandpoors.com/indices/sp-500/en/us/? [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 2:19 am by Matrix Law
Lifestyle Equities C.V. and another v Ahmed and another, heard 20th February 2023 JTI POLSKA Sp. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 8:32 am
HHJ Halbert has given judgment in a case called Southern Pacific Personal Loans Ltd v Walker (12 March 2009, Chester County Court) and has determined that Southern Pacific (”SP”) cannot enforce a particular loan against Mr & Mrs Walker. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 2:47 am by Matrix Law
Lifestyle Equities C.V. and another v Ahmed and another, heard 20th February 2023 Morgan and others v Ministry of Justice (Northern Ireland), heard 22nd February 2023 JTI POLSKA Sp. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 3:05 pm by Michael S. Snarr
A February 2006 fact sheet published by the Foreign Agriculture Service explains that the SPS Agreement was adopted during the Uruguay Round with the support of “[v]irtually all countries, including the United States” because countries previously had used vague and opaque SPS measures to disguise restrictions on trade. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:05 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Second Circuit says the plaintiff has a case.The case is Safepath Systems, LLC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 5:04 am by Eugene Volokh
The case against Dick's Sporting Goods -- which raises the claim discussed here last week -- is Watson v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Action4Canada v British Columbia (Attorney General), 2022 BCSC 1507 (CanLII) [71] Put simply, individuals have standing to question whether state actions infringe their Charter protected rights. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 1:10 pm
There is usually 'no better evidence of the state of one’s health” than the medical opinions from the patient’s current treating doctor.' (Gunn v. [read post]