Search for: "State v. Sailes" Results 1 - 20 of 581
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2021, 2:51 pm by Angie Gou
United States (in which the office supported sentencing reductions for certain crack-cocaine offenders). [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
Supreme Court described it in Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 7:23 am by admin
  Not sailed so much as blown and drifting   The case is Fane Lozman v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 4:34 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Citing the infamous Dred Scott decision and Loving v Virginia, a circuit court judge in Little Rock, Arkansas last Friday continued an unbroken procession of states to strike down state law bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 6:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
The Supreme Court granted review last year, and the Court's web site states the issues on appeal as follows: Does Serrano v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 7:30 am by Graham Webster
China’s rapid land reclamation and construction in the Spratlys and the July award issued by the UNCLOS tribunal in the Philippines v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 6:02 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has ruled in favor of accused spammers, in a decision which, as Professor Goldman states, is likely to "take some wind out of the sails of anti-spam plaintiffs. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 7:15 am by Eugene Volokh
You can read the Complaint in Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 3:19 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Shaw & Ors v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 98 (04 February 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2011] EWHC 159 (QB) (04 February 2011) Everton Football Club Company Ltd v Sail Group Ltd & Anor [2011] EWHC 126 (QB) (04 February 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Dias v London Borough of Havering [2011] EWHC 172 (Ch) (04 February 2011) Office of Fair Trading v… [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:05 am by CLAIRE DARWIN, MATRIX
‘The law on discrimination ought to be easy’, declared Lady Hale giving judgment on behalf of the Supreme Court in Essop v Home Office and Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 27. [read post]