Search for: "State v. Samuel E. Ball" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2022, 11:44 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Nikos Lavranos & Ahmed Mazlom, The Investment Treaty Implications of Covid-19 Responses by States Ronan O’Reilly, EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment – A Rebalancing of Investment Relations Lawrence Northmore-Ball, Jennifer Harvey, & Amber Courtier, Micula v Romania – A Saga of Lasting Significance Ondřej Svoboda, UNCITRAL Working Group III and Multilateral Investment Court – Troubled Waters for EU Normative… [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:22 pm by Ilya Shapiro
” That’s a big deal — regardless of how long Kennedy himself stays on the court — but in light of Justice Samuel Alito’s solo dissent (which rests firmly on Chevron, without questioning that doctrine’s scope), it might take more than one change in personnel to really move the ball. [read post]
On the assumption that five Supreme Court Justices—Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—are prepared to overrule Roe v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 10:55 am by Miriam Seifter
“If we’re looking to State law,” she suggested, “let’s look to State law, the whole ball of wax. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 11:13 pm
. Spotlight Unlocking Keywords to Ensure Effective E-Discovery Law Technology News Craig Ball, EDD special master, observes that misplaced confidence in the power of keyword searches can unnecessarily burden the electronic data discovery process. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
CHILDREN'S RIGHTS UNDER THE LAW / SAMUEL M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
CHILDREN'S RIGHTS UNDER THE LAW / SAMUEL M. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:48 pm by Mark Walsh
Sullivan is involved in any number of high-profile cases, including the matter of Hillary Clinton’s State Department e-mails, so worlds are colliding. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Three Justices—Justice Clarence Thomas and (separately) Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch—dissented from the denial of review and would have taken up the Republican Party’s claims on the merits. [read post]