Search for: "State v. Settle" Results 141 - 160 of 17,342
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2024, 7:31 am by Julius Stobbs (Stobbs IP)
The Advancetrack decision E-Accounting Solutions Ltd (t/a Advancetrack) v Global Infosys Ltd (t/a GI Outsourcing) was a 2023 High Court trade mark infringement dispute (concerning adwords). [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 4:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff was able to settle two personal injury cases, and got a cash advance from a funder. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:52 am
The Court has a twofold role: first, to settle, in accordance with international law,legal disputes submitted to it by States; and, second, to give advisory opinions on legal questionsreferred to it by duly authorized United Nations organs and agencies of the system. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm by Samah Rahman
Historically, courts have been cautious about encroaching on sacred terrain when interpreting family law; however, the Supreme Court of Canada in Marcovitz v Bruker, (2007 SCC 54), settled this contention. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm by Samah Rahman
Historically, courts have been cautious about encroaching on sacred terrain when interpreting family law; however, the Supreme Court of Canada in Marcovitz v Bruker, (2007 SCC 54), settled this contention. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
  Those have been traditionally considered to be almost unavailable (under the rule in Bonnard v Perryman) but there are judicial stirrings that this may be old law. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:19 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Anderson: States cannot disqualify candidates for federal offices from the ballot under Section 3. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
The Court has settled a politically charged issue in the volatile season of a Presidential election. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637 [2018], affd 35 NY3d 173 [2020]; see CPLR 3016 [b]; Palmieri v Perry, Van Etten, Rozanski & Primavera, LLP, 200 AD3d 785, 787 [2021]). [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am by Federica Paddeu
The ARS do not settle the question: after States’ cool reception of a proposal to this effect in the Sixth (legal) committee of the UN General Assembly in 2000, the ILC resolved to adopt a savings-clause, now in Article 54. [read post]