Search for: "State v. Shelley"
Results 21 - 40
of 201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2009, 9:13 am
Shelley Kenefick ran a Ponzi scheme that defrauded six investors, some of them elderly, of $890,000. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 9:46 am
By Erica Shelley Nelson and Brennen Johnson In City of Medina v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 4:42 pm
By Erica Shelley Nelson and Harrison Owens In Demetrio v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 10:27 am
By Erica Shelley Nelson and Brennen Johnson In Sambasivan v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 2:03 pm
By Erica Shelley Nelson and Harrison Owens In Predisik v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 10:09 am
By Erica Shelley Nelson and Brennen Johnson In Hall v. [read post]
Police Officer Makes Plausible Claim That City Retaliated After He Won A Reverse Discrimination Case
16 Apr 2015, 11:35 am
By Erica Shelley Nelson and Brennen Johnson In Smith v. [read post]
Book Chapter: “From the Welfare State to the Militarized Market: Losing Choices, Controlling Losers”
7 Jun 2011, 4:59 am
As with the market fundamentalism in Lochner v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 1:27 am
Sebold, as the executor of the Will, and Shelley Rodeheaver, a residuary beneficiary whose request to intervene was granted, opposed the State's action. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 7:10 pm
SELBY and SHELLEY J. [read post]
3 May 2007, 3:17 am
... 1948, in Shelley v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 4:49 pm
Jones and Erica Shelley Nelson In Becerra Becerra v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:26 pm
By Erica Shelley Nelson and Kasey Burton In Cox v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 2:33 pm
By Erica Shelley Nelson and Sarah Burke In Cecchini v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:35 pm
Jones In Rekhter v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 5:28 am
Here is the abstract:This essay uses the Mobius strip as a mathematical metaphor for how state "defense of marriage amendments" (DOMAs) can twist the Shelley v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
” F.C.C. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 2:42 pm
" Shelley v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 7:00 am
United Statesor Camp v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:22 pm
Explanations for why federal courts sometimes treat the private actions of private parties as public actions subject to the Constitution, like the Supreme Court did in Shelley v. [read post]
