Search for: "State v. Sherman" Results 181 - 200 of 1,941
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm by Jonathan M. Barnett
Note that this would represent a significant step beyond the per se rule that Sherman Act case law applies to certain cases of horizontal collusion. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:38 pm
After learning about this information sharing arrangement, Hardwire amended its complaint to add Freyssinet International and Freyssinet USA as defendants on the theory that the defendants had engaged in a violation of the RICO statute, federal and state trade secrets laws, fraud, civil conspiracy, and violations of the federal Sherman anti-trust statute. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 5:49 am by Tom Dannenbaum
One or another version of the prohibition is also included in the national war crimes codes of several of the states that have opened investigations into alleged war crimes in Ukraine, including Estonia § 95(1), France art. 461-25, Germany, § 11(1)(5), Liechtenstein § 321e(1)(9), Norway § 106(b), and Sweden § 9(8). [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 12:17 pm
The conclusion maintains that a liberal originalist approach to interpreting the Connecticut constitution is preferable to the less generous approach to deciding individual rights cases articulated by the Connecticut Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 12:17 pm by Christine Corcos
The conclusion maintains that a liberal originalist approach to interpreting the Connecticut constitution is preferable to the less generous approach to deciding individual rights cases articulated by the Connecticut Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
The conclusion maintains that a liberal originalist approach to interpreting the Connecticut constitution is preferable to the less generous approach to deciding individual rights cases articulated by the Connecticut Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 4:20 pm by Bona Law PC
The Court’s ultimate reasoning: the Sherman Act did not apply because baseball did not have an impact on interstate commerce: “The business is giving exhibitions of baseball, which are purely state affairs. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 9:19 am by Bona Law PC
Now we can add one more factor: (v) the concerted action by members of a state licensing board can indeed be unreasonable under the Sherman Act, even if they seek to achieve their anticompetitive aims through the exercise of valid regulatory authority. [read post]