Search for: "State v. Skates, et al."
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2020, 6:27 am
The United States Figure Skating Association received a registration for this brand in in September of 2015 by registering it as an educational service. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:27 am
The United States Figure Skating Association received a registration for this brand in in September of 2015 by registering it as an educational service. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:27 am
The United States Figure Skating Association received a registration for this brand in in September of 2015 by registering it as an educational service. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:27 am
The United States Figure Skating Association received a registration for this brand in in September of 2015 by registering it as an educational service. [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:16 pm
MOSES SEGAL, ET AL. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 10:27 am
KORAL MOORE, ET AL. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:01 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 1:34 pm
Source: Complaint at 4, Vans, Inc. et al v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 1:34 pm
Source: Complaint at 4, Vans, Inc. et al v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:59 am
Carpenter, Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 5:03 pm
James Breheny, et al. [read post]
7 May 2007, 12:05 am
See Brief for Sandra Cano et al. as Amici Curiae in No. 05-380, pp. 22-24. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
(Article One Partners) Patenting green technology: What you need to know (IPEG) US Patents – Decisions CAFC decision in case concerning laser inscribing of diamonds a mixed bag: Lazare Kaplan v PhotoScribe (IPBiz) CAFC sides with USPTO in patent re-examination declaration dispute: In re Meyer Manufacturing (Patents Post-Grant) District Court N D Illinois: Scrivener’s error in patent marking does not preclude finding of intent to deceive: Lundeen et al… [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:36 am
While Cohen, et al., have not yet had jeopardy attach by plea or the start of trial, such that New York’s double jeopardy statute would kick in, any conduct in question has already been committed. [read post]
10 May 2023, 3:43 pm
Ltd. et al., 1984 CanLII 54 (BC SC). [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
The Hydrogen Technology Corporation et al In the Southern District of New York, the SEC brought another civil action. [read post]
Do We Finally Have a Canadian Re:Sound Copyright “Fitness Tariff” After 8 Years? “Are We There Yet”?
1 Jun 2015, 3:07 pm
Here’s the timeline:Tariff is filed June 2, 2007Board Hearing April 27 to May 11, 2010Board Decision July 6, 2012Judicial Review Application Filed August 7, 2012Hearing by Federal Court of Appeal (“FCA”) November 19, 2013 Decision by Federal Court of Appeal February 24, 2014Parties File Settlement March 21, 2014 On April 17, 2014 the Board ruled that: Those parts of Re:Sound Tariff No. 6.B (Use of Recorded Music to Accompany Physical Activities) that… [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:55 am
Batty v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360) Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons) Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian… [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:02 pm
Greenberg et al., 965 A.2d 763 (Del. [read post]
