Search for: "State v. Spiegel"
Results 41 - 60
of 131
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm
Issues under consideration include whether the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights can be relied upon to justify exceptions or limitations beyond those in the Copyright Directive; and whether a link to a PDF amounts to publication for the purposes of the quotation exception (Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck, C-516/17). [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 10:52 am
Issues under consideration include whether the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights can be relied upon to justify exceptions or limitations beyond those in the Copyright Directive; and whether a link to a PDF amounts to publication for the purposes of the quotation exception (Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck, C-516/17). [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 10:52 am
Issues under consideration include whether the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights can be relied upon to justify exceptions or limitations beyond those in the Copyright Directive; and whether a link to a PDF amounts to publication for the purposes of the quotation exception (Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck, C-516/17). [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 3:50 am
See Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d 266, 268 (I st Dept 2006) (“The failure to demonstrate proximate cause mandates the dismissal of a legal malpractice action regardles~ of whether the attorney was negligent. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 12:26 am
€$€The Authors' Take:-- Disparaging or offensive trademark registrations in the United States Are there any limits after the US Supreme Court's decision in Matal v Tam? [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:29 am
On October 11, 2017, in Spiegel v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm
In late 2013, WPR, on behalf of its client NCO, filed suits in Illinois state court seeking repayment of student debt owed by Marquez, Garriga, and Russell. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
Footnote 2 in Stewart states: Consistent with its statutory purpose, the Sheriff's resort to Civil Service Law §71 was presumably 'to secure a steady, reliable, and adequate work force' (Matter of Duncan v New York State Dev. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:15 am
If you think it is a lot, then maybe you will be surprised to learn that in 1933, according to Der Spiegel, the book has sold over 1.5 million copies in Germany alone. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:15 am
If you think it is a lot, then maybe you will be surprised to learn that in 1933, according to Der Spiegel, the book has sold over 1.5 million copies in Germany alone. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm
Murtagh, supra; Application of Clouse, Sup., 121 N.Y.S.2d 136; Spiegel v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:40 am
Der Spiegel reports that the German Foreign Intelligence Service has carried out surveillance on various EU allies, the United States, the Vatican, and a handful of NGOs. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 10:55 am
” With over 20 states expected to be represented in Vienna, “most attention is focused on the United States, Russia, Iran and Saudi Arabia. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 1:07 pm
” Bartnicki v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 1:07 pm
” Bartnicki v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 12:13 pm
Related Issues: NSA SpyingSecurityState-Sponsored MalwareRelated Cases: EFF v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:31 pm
One tribal leader was quoted saying, “they come in with a list of names and are more organized than state intelligence. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
