Search for: "State v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 257,444
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2024, 10:52 am by Giles Peaker
Further, applying RR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2019] UKSC 52 it was possible to disapply the discriminatory parts of the regulations to give JA a remedy without her needing to make a separate human rights claim. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:38 am by Larry
United States and asked whether I would post on the decision here. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:48 am by Unknown
In oral argument in the appeal of the latter case, the Supreme Court grappled with how broadly to construe Sarbanes-Oxley’s prohibition on “otherwise obstruct[ing]” an official proceeding (U.S. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am by Dan Bressler
” “In support of this argument, IMTC cited two foreign (and therefore non-binding) cases in which no conflict of interest was found to exist: Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Company NZ Ltd (1994) (New Zealand) and HSBC (HK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice (2001) (Hong Kong). [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:38 am by Ellena Erskine
ShareThe justices will hear oral argument in Department of State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:24 am by Felix Le Roux
  The case is Organi Mark (Pty) Ltd v Goolam Nabi Ebrahim Akoodie and Another (240/2023) [2024] ZASCA 44 (8 April 2024). [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:24 am by Felix Le Roux
  The case is Organi Mark (Pty) Ltd v Goolam Nabi Ebrahim Akoodie and Another (240/2023) [2024] ZASCA 44 (8 April 2024). [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As to the penalty imposed, dismissal from his employment with the New York City police department, the Appellate Division opined that "the penalty of dismissal is not disproportionate to the seriousness of the multiple violations involved", citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As to the penalty imposed, dismissal from his employment with the New York City police department, the Appellate Division opined that "the penalty of dismissal is not disproportionate to the seriousness of the multiple violations involved", citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 4:11 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[Simmons Little Bluestone LP v Nationwide Insurance Co of Florida case no 2:22-cv-02822 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Western Division] [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 4:11 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[Simmons Little Bluestone LP v Nationwide Insurance Co of Florida case no 2:22-cv-02822 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Western Division] [read post]