Search for: "State v. Stills"
Results 1 - 20
of 49,781
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2024, 10:02 am
Copan Italia S.p.A. v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
Stating that it had never directly addressed the question and citing Daimler7 and Magill v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 9:06 pm
FDA approvals still only cover lab-grown meat from two companies — Upside Foods and Good Meat. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:55 pm
In Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
State deficiencies in climate litigations and actions of judges Laurent Fonbaustier / Renaud Braillet 165 Part IV: Cities, States and Climate Change: Between Competition, Conflict and Cooperation Global climate governance turning translocal Delphine Misonne 181 America’s Climate Change Policy: Federalism in Action Daniel Esty 193 Local policies on climate change in a centralized State: The Example of France Camille… [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:37 pm
Courts will still be obligated to respect agencies’ fact-based findings under the State Farm standard regardless of what happens to Chevron deference. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:39 am
A.J.Z. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am
X Corp. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:45 am
City of New York v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” In addition, if more states enact fair access laws, financial institutions may be required to comply with an increasing number of fair access laws that may be inconsistent from state to state. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:42 pm
VILER, Appellants, v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 8:43 am
Warsame v Hounslow LBC (2000) WLR 696 on s.193(7) considered. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:31 pm
Washington, D.C. super-lawyer, Gene Schaerr, has filed an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:37 pm
The California Supreme Court’s decision in Naranjo v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
Circuit’s application of the Fitzgerald test in Blassingame v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:35 am
[7] Maslowski et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 4:34 am
” People v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am
ACD disputed any advantage conferred by the overlap, and argued that in any event MI’s system still confers the benefit of using two probes rather than one and therefore infringed. [read post]
