Search for: "State v. Sugar" Results 81 - 100 of 719
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2016, 9:47 pm by Ad Law Defense
** FDA concludes its study on “Evaporated Cane Juice” – issues guidance that it is a misleading description for mere Sugar… [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 11:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
United States, 298 U.S. 242 (1936) - an offer of proof that irrigation water could be transported to the land was not too "remote and speculative," and should have been allowed in support of the property owner's contention that the highest and best use of the land taken was to grow sugar cane. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 7:57 pm by John W. Arden
Thus, the court held that the Board of Health exceeded its authority under Boreali v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 11:30 am by Smita Ghosh
Sugar is bad,” we learn from the Guardian’s review of James Walvin’s Sugar. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 2:43 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Secretary of State for the Home Department v Pankina [2010] EWCA Civ 719 (23 June 2010) Khader v Aziz & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 716 (23 June 2010) Annulment Funding Company Ltd v Cowey & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 711 (23 June 2010) Sugar v The British Broadcasting Commission & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 715 (23 June 2010) AET Inc Ltd v Arcadia Petroleum Ltd “Eagle Valencia” [2010] EWCA Civ 713… [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:23 am by Gritsforbreakfast
I wish I knew what secret forces were pushing to keep the Central Unit in Sugar Land open. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 12:32 pm by WIMS
United States Sugar urges the Appeals Court to exercise hypothetical jurisdiction and deny the petitions. [read post]