Search for: "State v. Toll" Results 201 - 220 of 3,684
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2019, 3:16 pm
  Yet if he's wrong -- if, for example, he was mistaken, or even brazenly lying about the residence of the parties -- then all of the sudden he gets the benefit of tolling, since the state claims are now based on supplemental jurisdiction.Seems irrational  Why have a longer tolling period for the wrongdoer, while potentially barring the honest guy on limitations grounds? [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:28 am
Request for reconsideration of an administrative determination does not toll the running of the statute of limitationMatter of Bahr v MTA N.Y. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 8:12 pm by Kate Howard
The petition of the day is: Artis v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 11:00 am
The Court stated that the insanity toll of CPLR 208 was available to those individuals who are unable to protect their legal rights because of an over-all inability to function in society. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:24 pm by Steven Kaufhold
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in Credit Suisse Securities v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 4:15 am
The Appellate Division ruled that “In the absence of a provision in the CBA providing for the tolling of the statute of limitations while [CSEA] exhausted the grievance process, the mere fact that the CBA required [CSEA] to exhaust the grievance process before filing suit in state court did not toll the statute of limitations,” citing Nassau Ch. [read post]