Search for: "State v. Tompkins" Results 81 - 100 of 257
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Footnote 2 in Stewart states: Consistent with its statutory purpose, the Sheriff's resort to Civil Service Law §71 was presumably 'to secure a steady, reliable, and adequate work force' (Matter of Duncan v New York State Dev. [read post]
8 May 2016, 6:24 pm by Dennis Crouch
Tompkins, a federal court ruling on a matter of state law under its diversity jurisdiction must apply the law of the state from which the dispute arose. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 11:12 am
Tompkins is best known for its statement that “[t]here is no federal general common law. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 10:24 am by Venkat Balasubramani
(“23andMe’s Browsewrap Fails, But Its Post-Purchase Clickthrough Works Anyway–Tompkins v. 23andMe“.) [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:41 pm
 Cisco therefore argued that the jury instruction was incorrect because nowhere did it state that knowledge of the inducement was the standard. [read post]