Search for: "State v. Town of Grants" Results 61 - 80 of 2,061
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2023, 11:03 am by Nicolas Castillo, Managing CPA
Other options include Engel & Völkers, HomeEspaña, and SBD Immobles. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 11:57 am by Eugene Volokh
Formerly employed by the Town of Lisbon ("Town") police department, Doe complains that the Town caused the New Hampshire Department of Justice to add his name to the EES. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 1:13 pm by Amy Howe
But once Oklahoma became a state in 1907 and Tulsa reorganized under Oklahoma law, the court of appeals explained, the Curtis Act’s grant of power over violations of municipal laws committed by its Native American residents no longer applied to Tulsa. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 11:52 pm by Frank Cranmer
” Michael Sadgrove, Dean Emeritus of Durham Grant aid to places of worship As regular readers will be aware, Trevor Cooper of the Historic Religious Buildings Alliance and Frank, as members of DCMS’s Places of Worship Forum, have long been arguing for clarification of the law on the powers of civil parish and town councils to grant aid local places of worship. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:18 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Warren is Lee Schubert; and, in all likelihood, Bedoya will continue to work in this town. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am by John Elwood
The district court granted the government’s motion to dismiss, holding that the MRT is a “taxation of income” falling within Congress’s power under the 16th Amendment. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
Ernst[1] As Dennis reported, the Supreme Court has granted certiorari in the case of Vidal v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The injunction prohibits defendants from continuing to collect co-payments and does not mandate specific conduct by them (State of New York v Town of Haverstraw, 219 AD2d 64, 65-66 [2d Dept 1996]; see generally Second on Second CafÉ, Inc. v Hing Sing Trading, Inc., 66 AD3d 255, 264 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The injunction prohibits defendants from continuing to collect co-payments and does not mandate specific conduct by them (State of New York v Town of Haverstraw, 219 AD2d 64, 65-66 [2d Dept 1996]; see generally Second on Second CafÉ, Inc. v Hing Sing Trading, Inc., 66 AD3d 255, 264 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]