Search for: "State v. Travers"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 5:39 am
In Travers v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 5:39 am
In Travers v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:57 pm
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:22 pm
Max-Planck-Gesellschaftzur Forderung der Wissenschaften E.V. et Beech Aircraft Corp. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2019, 9:46 am
The analysis of the significance of European family law will inevitably vary depending on which point of view is adopted: the point of view of national peoples, mobile European citizens, nationals of third-party states living in the Union or aspiring to live there, States or the Union …. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:35 pm
The hearing will feature testimony from David Glawe, the undersecretary of homeland security for intelligence and analysis; Christopher Wray, the director of the FBI; and Russell Travers, the director of the National Counterterrorism Center. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm
" The committee will hear testimony from FBI Director Christopher Wray, and has subpoenaed Kevin McAleenan, the acting secretary of Homeland Security, and Russell Travers, the acting director of the National Counterterrorism Center, in an effort to compel their testimony. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 10:56 am
Under the overall theme “Time to act: Governments as catalysts for business respect for human rights”, the 2019 Forum will focus on the need for more coherent and concrete action by States, including effective regulation, improved policy coherence, and leading by example in the various roles States have as economic actors. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
Further, the elements of the cause of action of negligence, together with the threshold stated by this Court in Mustapha v. [read post]
3 Jun 2017, 8:12 pm
In Payden-Travers v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 6:50 am
Haggenmacher & V. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
The Department of Justice (DOJ) offers Kamal-Griffin v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 8:44 am
” State v Nelson, 1998 SD 124; 587 NW2d 439, 444 (1998). [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm
We are happy to confirm that this was not the intended meaning, as indeed the article stated he is honest and hard working. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 5:54 am
V. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
(Jones v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 5:03 am
In Travers v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:23 am
Managers who decided to fire a skycap after a passenger complained that he solicited tips likely knew of the CEO’s anger over the employee’s lead role in a separate FLSA suit and, given that skycaps were allowed to tell customers that tips were appreciated, a jury could find retaliatory animus was the but-for cause of the adverse action, determined the First Circuit, reversing summary judgment on the skycap’s retaliation claim (Travers v Flight Services &… [read post]
