Search for: "State v. Trier" Results 81 - 100 of 1,759
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2014, 2:42 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 1988) (“Intent is a factual determination particularlywithin the province of the trier of fact. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 11:42 am
Buie, No. 278732, holding, in a case of first impression for Michigan, that the United States Supreme Court’s Confrontation Clause analysis in Maryland v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 5:25 am
The Court found that it was up to the Commission, as trier of fact, to draw inferences from conflicting evidence, and that here Traina was "peculiarly available" to Bereano, based on their business relationship, that was not countermanded by the Commission's ability to subpoena Traina, had it chosen to do so. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:30 am by Jeremy Tyler
While the standards for expert witness testimony may differ between state and federal courts, all federal courts are bound by Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Daubert v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 8:31 am by Steven Cohen
 The plaintiff challenged his testimony stating that his testimony was outside of his expertise, unreliable, and would not assist the trier of fact. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:09 am by MBettman
  As in any weight-of-the evidence challenge, the credibility of witnesses is primarily for the trier of fact to assess. [read post]