Search for: "State v. Ture" Results 21 - 40 of 79
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Such a change would likely require changes to the federal and state constitutions. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner’s recent speech at the Alan Turing Institute on 23 March can be found here. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 11:17 am by Kevin
Shkreli had named his company “Turing Pharmaceuticals” after Alan Turing, who helped break the codes, but he also had a more stupid reason for owning it, as he told Vanity Fair a few years ago. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 7:00 am by Robert Chesney, Danielle Citron
Think of it as a destructive variation of the Turing test: imitation designed to mislead and deceive rather than to emulate and iterate. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
United States The Socially Aware Blog has a post which considers a recent decision made by the Sixth Circuit in Signature Management Team, LLC v. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
  Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 15 December 2017 Chaney J handed down judgment in the case of Rayney v State of Western Australia [2017] WASC 367. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
“, Turing Lecture Theatre, IET, London Savoy Place, Savoy Place, London WC2R 0BL 26 February 2018, “Global Internet and Jurisdiction Conference,” Ottawa, Canada. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 1:24 pm
Veazie, 8 How. 251, 255–256 (1850); United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Peter Odili, at the state High Court, Port Harcourt. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 1:49 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The work of Leibniz was more directed to differential calculus and Newton more concerned with integration.Other work of Leibniz pre-saged much work of Alan Turing, which is curiously cited in Ten Law Professors’ Brief in Trading Technologies v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 4:30 am by Walter Haydock
  Technological Issues and the State of Artificial Intelligence A key metric for determining whether an AITP is ready to deploy against human targets is if it passes the “Turing Test. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
” 1863: The New Zealand Settlements Act, which authorized the government to confiscate land from certain tribes without compensation, was passed. 1877: In Wi Parata v The Bishop of Wellington, the chief justice of the Supreme Court declared the Treaty to be “worthless” and a “simple nullity. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 5:25 am by SHG
It was only in 2003 that the United States Supreme Court struck a fatal blow to sodomy laws, in the landmark Lawrence v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
 It was most likely some classic tort or contract case (see Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Bomb or Caparo v Dickman). [read post]