Search for: "State v. Union Public Service District" Results 1 - 20 of 1,348
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2014, 4:57 am by Robert Kreisman
District Court granted the state’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and the unions, the plaintiffs, brought this appeal. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:48 pm by WIMS
"       The Appeals Court affirmed the district court's rulings on Southern Union's conviction, as set forth in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 12:27 pm
  A panel of the Appellate Division, 3rd Dept., rejected the school district's challenge to a ruling by the state's Public Employment Relations Board that the district violated the NY Civil Service Law by refusing to provide documentation to the AFT local union representing the district's teachers about the reason for the discharge. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 3:47 am by SHG
” A decision for the plaintiffs in Friedrichs would tell the nation’s 6.2 million unionized state, city, county and school district employees that they can enjoy the benefits offered by their unions without having to pay for them. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm by Steven G. Pearl
The District Court dismissed their claims, and the Seventh Circuit affirmed in relevant part, concluding that the PAs were state employees within the meaning of Abood v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:55 am
”* In addition, Justice Costello commented that “it is the clear public policy of this State, as set forth in the Taylor Law (Article 14 of the Civil Service Law), that a school board may not discriminate against teachers or administrators for exercising their right to belong to or participate in an employees' union. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:28 pm
The status of the individual performing services for a public employer may be critical in determining liabilityCzark v Hauppauge UFSD, NYS Supreme Court, [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports]The Czark case illustrates that the status of the individual performing services for a public employer may be critical in determining whether or not the public employer will be held liable for an injury to an individual.A Hauppauge… [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 4:09 am
States and political subdivisions of states are not employers within the meaning of the National Labor Relations ActFord v D.C. 37 Union Local 1549, CA2d Circuit, Docket No. 08-2317-cvRoxanne Ford appealed a judgment by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New dismissing her complaint alleging that DC-37 breached the duty of fair representation.Ford, however, had filed her claims against DC-37 pursuant to the… [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 7:27 am
What can the second employee’s union do about the award? [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 12:49 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]