Search for: "State v. Venable" Results 61 - 80 of 95
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2012, 8:25 am
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court last week reversed itself on its ruling to maintaining a Pennsylvania state court thimerosal claim in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Bruesewitz v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:07 am by Staci Zaretsky
Now, two months later, NYLS is packing some Biglaw heat and moving to dismiss the complaint.In a case of David v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 12:00 pm by Don Cruse
The defendants (a Dallas County election official and the Secretary of State) challenged whether Venable had standing. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 1:40 pm by Danielle Ulman
State this year that left the tech-loving Sandler disappointed. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:10 pm by Adrian Lurssen
Ceglia v Facebook - Answer and Affirmative Defenses | Paul Ceglia v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
  However, in Venables and Thompson v News Group Newspapers([2001] EWHC 32 (QB)) Butler-Sloss P held that such an injunction could be granted in support of an action for breach of confidence. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 5:12 pm by INFORRM
  However, in Venables and Thompson v News Group Newspapers ([2001] EWHC 32 (QB)) Butler-Sloss P held that such an injunction could be granted in support of an action for breach of confidence. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
SG and 35 state AGs have weighed in claiming that data mining does not merit First Amendment protection. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 5:30 am by Emily Chan
The Healthy Workplace Bill has not been enacted in any state but has been proposed in 17 states, including California. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:50 am by Adrian Lurssen
"- Legal Aspects of Social Networking and Online Media Platforms (by Venable LLP):Slide presentation from a recent seminar by law firm Venable LLP, covering legal aspects of social networking, including privacy, employee conduct, and how to create and implement a social media policy in the workplace...- City of Ontario v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
Rooney, Coulson, Hague: balancing privacy and expression Revisited and Updated: Strasbourg on Privacy and Reputation, Part 3 Defamation Damages: USA and England Compared Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Information: Part 1:  The European Convention Alastair Brett – as he leaves The Times, Lectures: Lord Neuberger on the balance between privacy and freedom of expression Libel Reform Debate: Part 1 “Burden of Proof” Case Law: Political Blog Libel Action Struck out as Abuse… [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 7:17 am by michael
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Oracle America Inc v M-Tech Data Ltd & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 997 (24 August 2010) Southern Insulation (Medway) Ltd v How Engineering Services Ltd & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 999 (20 August 2010) Chubb Fire Ltd v The Vicar of Spalding & Churchwardens and Church Council of the Church of St Mary & St Nicholas, Spalding [2010] EWCA Civ 981 (20 August 2010) Sebastian Holdings Inc v Deutsche Bank AG [2010] EWCA Civ 998 (20… [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Making an Effective Case Directly to the TV Networks Jennifer Santos, Vice President, Ad Standards, NBC History of network challenges: 1971, FTC started encouraging comparative advertising. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In past downturns, we haven’t seen ads like this (v. something staplegunned to a telephone pole). [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:34 am by chief
Regular readers will recall that blanket policies are not to be encouraged (those with a need for more citable authority should see something like Lord Browne-Wilkinson in R v SSHD ex p Venables). [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:34 am by chief
Regular readers will recall that blanket policies are not to be encouraged (those with a need for more citable authority should see something like Lord Browne-Wilkinson in R v SSHD ex p Venables). [read post]