Search for: "State v. Vo"
Results 1 - 20
of 202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2024, 1:32 am
There is a short English phrase – not suitable for print – but featuring the word “cake” that sums this principle up nicely. [1] When reading this point, the authors were reminded of the decision of Vos J in Fresenius v Carefusion [2011] EWHC 2969 in which it was held that if a patentee consented to the revocation of its patent, it was not appropriate for it to be compelled to… [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:02 am
Sahil Kapur and Frank Thorp V report for NBC News. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am
Einer Elhauge, has stated: “Dozens of empirical studies have now confirmed this economic reality that common shareholding alters corporate behavior. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm
Athwal v State of Queensland [2023] QCA 156 considered the constitutionality of the prohibition under Queensland’s Weapons Act 1990 on bringing a kirpan into a school. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 6:38 am
The Court rejected the State Government’s arguments. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Under this theory, the Supreme Court held in American Electric Power v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:29 am
Since, however, this court is bound by Novo, it is for the Supreme Court to decide whether to depart from the law as stated by Lord Dyson in that case”. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
EFF appealed the case before the state's transparency board, which eventually forced Escobedo to release a slideshow and receipts showing the city had wasted more than 4 million pesos on the Sistema de Predicción de Delitos (SPRED) project. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 4:47 am
The importance of dealing with a suspected breach properly and ensuring that the correct steps are taken to minimise any risk of a breach is made clear by the comments of Sir Geoffrey Vos MR in R v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy [2022] EWCA Civ 181. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
This Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:31 am
In Impression Products v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:28 am
Vos J stated that the Human Rights Act 1998 is individualised, and as such neither the gypsy and traveller community nor any other community has Article 8 rights (a person’s right to respect for their private and family life, home and correspondence). [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 8:01 am
HvJ EU 7 april 2022, ECLI:EU:C:2022:264, NIPR 2022, 288 (J/H Limited) / p. 650-659 Abstract In J v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 5:22 am
"Tomorrow, the Mannheim Regional Court will hold a preliminary injunction hearing in a DivX v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:36 am
"While the first Ericsson v. [read post]
26 Nov 2022, 3:25 am
In the part of the jurisprudence, two recent judgments of the CJEU are presented: the decision No C-572/21 (CC/VO) regarding international jurisdiction on parental responsibility, when the usual residence of the child was legally transferred during the trial to a third state, that is a signatory to the 1996 Convention, , with a comment by the Judge Mr. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:57 am
In choosing that test over the “statement of claim” test applied at first instance, the leading judgment (authored by Master of the Rolls, Sir Geoffrey Vos) stated that the FII test “must be intended to operate in all situations in which there has been a mistake, fraud or concealment, and to be consistent with the Limitation Act more generally. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 6:14 am
OPPO/OPPO v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
As mentioned above, on 20 and 21 July 2022, the Court of Appeal (Vos MR, Sharp P and King LJ) heard the appeal Guardian News and Media v Executor of HRH Prince Philip challenging the decision to exclude the press from the hearing in September 2021 regarding the will of Prince Philip. [read post]
