Search for: "State v. Welsh"
Results 101 - 120
of 287
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2015, 8:53 am
The new test focuses on the defendant’s contacts with the forum state, rather than with the plaintiffs. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
In R v Marcott, Justices Arbour and Osler concurred that an element of the offense was “that deception is practiced…and that the person undertaking to tell fortunes represents that he has the power to do so with the intention that such representation should be believed”, and “[where an] assertion, or undertaking [to predict the future] is made for reward…with intent to deceive, the offense is complete. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:03 am
Presenters often appear to be ill-briefed and insufficiently armed with the facts necessary to challenge assertions made by interviewees in live interviews, reflecting not just pressure on them but a lack of understanding by programme researchers and producers He also pointed to ‘evidence of a misunderstanding of the political process in the EU’, drawing attention in particular to written evidence submitted by the Labour Party which stated that ‘too often it seems that… [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 3:35 am
Her predominant legal interest lies in the areas of state crime and international human rights. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 9:53 pm
Cogan transfer the relevant files to another law firm, Welsh & Katz, to continue prosecution before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
The CAFC referred to the Gunn v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Government Ordered to Maintain Expensive Custom Database Shared with Criminal Defendant: In the criminal case of United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 10:24 am
Although States do enjoy a wide margin of appreciation in complying with Art 14, 'regard' must still be had to changes to the legal and social consensus (Tekeli v Turkey). [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 1:52 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:23 am
State v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 3:56 pm
Supreme Court's 2012 decision in Miller v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 2:01 pm
Specifically, the DWP argued that the FTT (a) They had applied the wrong test for justification (b) They had not followed the decision of the Court of Appeal in R(MA and Others) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2014] PTSR 584. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 2:06 am
Welsh v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 4:38 am
BootsDeckers Outdoor Corporation v J.C. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 1:57 pm
In early August, the Tennessee Court of Appeals decided a case of first impression, Torres v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am
Paul Bernal’s blog had a number of posts on the subject, including “Surveillance and Austerity” and “DRIP: normalising the surveillance state”. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 11:30 am
United States (1970) and United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 9:10 am
United States (1970). [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:07 pm
The appeal in the case of Heesom v Public Services Ombudsman for Wales ([2014] EWHC 1504 (Admin)) was brought by a former Welsh Councillor against his disqualification from being a member of a Council. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:58 am
One of these referred to in the government's own impact assessment is Newport (Ymerodraeth State of Mind), a hilarious take on the Jay-Z and Alicia Keys song, Empire State of Mind, with completely original visuals and lyrics that poke gentle fun at Welsh culture and language. [read post]
