Search for: "State v. Welsh"
Results 121 - 140
of 287
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2014, 6:44 pm
Rutherford & Ors v Secretary of State for Work And Pensions [2014] EWHC 1613 (Admin) This was the Judicial Review, supported by CPAG, of the failure of the bedroom tax regulations to address the position of tenants where a bedroom was needed for overnight carers for a child. [read post]
2 May 2014, 4:41 am
In an email Kidde sent inNovember 2010, [he] stated he could no longer work with Bergstein because Bank of America had put him on ChexSystems, which prevented him from opening a bank account anywhere in the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:25 pm
However, the CJEU's decision in Roche v Primus rejected this strategy. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 1:40 pm
Illinois, along with several other states, have initiated the re-sentencing of those who received life terms as juveniles following the 2012 Supreme Court decision in Miller v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
” However, in Amato v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 2:49 am
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland), heard 22 – 23 January 2014. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 1:58 am
The relevant public by reference to which the absolute ground for refusal must be assessed is the average consumer in the Member State in which the place designated by a GI is situated. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm
Libel damages were awarded in a case brought by a Welsh Conservative AM Mohammad Asghar and a businessman, Abdul Rahman Mujahid, against an Urdu language newspaper, Nawaijang and two individuals following an assessment hearing. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:48 am
R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice (26 Mar 2014): The appellant was convicted of robbery and given a determinate sentence, and was automatically eligible for release from custody halfway through the sentence. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 2:11 pm
Yet the Court upheld this exemption against such a challenge, in Corporation of Presiding Bishop v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:01 am
United States, 466 U.S. at 170, 104 S.Ct. 1735. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 12:07 am
Let me weigh that up for a minute….Money v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 3:18 pm
While the provision considered is effectively the same, there is a distinction made in terms of justification of policy which may be significant.It is a reasoned decision based on Article 14, distinguishing MA & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Ors [2013] EWHC 2213 (QB). [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 3:18 pm
While the provision considered is effectively the same, there is a distinction made in terms of justification of policy which may be significant.It is a reasoned decision based on Article 14, distinguishing MA & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Ors [2013] EWHC 2213 (QB). [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:31 am
R (T & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (9 – 10 December): The respondents both had police cautions/warnings given long ago appear on enhanced criminal records checks. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:36 pm
Also, it was held in Payton v New York and Welsh v Wisconsin that without probable cause for an arrest, the police had absolutely no authority to chase the defendant or to enter his apartment. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 5:02 am
In Welch v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 5:02 am
In Welch v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:22 pm
In East Sussex Children Services v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 6:30 am
Monday’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
