Search for: "State v. Wharton"
Results 81 - 100
of 221
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2008, 1:02 am
Supreme Court reversed a conviction in Boulware v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 3:23 am
Hindsight arguments concerning selection of one of several reasonable courses of action do not state a viable cause of action for malpractice (Brookwood Cos., Inc. v Alston & Bird LLP, 146 AD3d 662, 667 [2017]). [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:04 pm
Supreme Court holds that states lack standing to challenge immigration prioritization guidelines. _____________________________________________________________________ With Its Student Loan Decision, the Court Again Limits Agency Authority July 20, 2023 | Kate Shaw, Cardozo Law School, and Crawford Schneider, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School In Biden v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 8:23 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 8:20 am
Karp, partners at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, discuss Estate of Pew v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 12:55 pm
State, 72 Ga. 164 (1883); People v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 9:20 pm
Virginia State Board of Elections and Cooper v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 2:15 pm
In a related family separation case, M.M.M. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 8:57 pm
Statutory Protections v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
(Actually, I will be on Knowledge@Wharton’s daily show on SiriusXM channel 111 – Business Radio Powered by The Wharton School today from 10-12 EDT, as a follow-up to yesterday’s post, discussing Monday’s Supreme Court decision in EEOC v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
ENDNOTES [1] Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison represents the Defendant-Appellee, Guy Elliott, and Kannon Shanmugam argued in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on behalf of Guy Elliott on May 19, 2022. [2] — F.4th –, 2022 WL 2760323, *1 (2d Cir. 2022). [3] 139 S. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 8:56 am
L v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 6:12 am
Specifically, the paper (i) discusses insights from extant literature in accounting, finance, management, and economics that are relevant for an assessment of the economic effects of CSR reporting; (ii) reviews the key determinants and the current state of CSR reporting; (iii) discusses potential effects of mandatory CSR reporting standards for important stakeholders such as investors, lenders, analysts and the media, consumers, employees, but also for society at large; (iv) outlines firm… [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:23 pm
United States Tobacco (working paper, 2007). [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 1:14 am
Authority in this area is sparse; in fact, a decision of the Tax Court last month, Ocmulgee Fields Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 1:15 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 1:39 pm
— United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 1:44 pm
First Data Merchant Services Corp. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:30 am
And such laws cannot survive even the less stringent standard of review articulated in United States v. [read post]
