Search for: "State v. Whittle" Results 1 - 20 of 208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2020, 6:51 am by Daily Record Staff
And, unlike a piece of carved wood that lays bare the work of a knife’s whittling, when the object of abuse is a human being, layers of shame, fear, and trauma often obscure the imprint of mental and physical abuse. ... [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:36 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Evans, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 2243 (04 November 2009) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MM (Iran) v Secretary of State for Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 1167 (10 November 2009) Choudhary & Ors v Bhatter & Ors [2009] EWCA Civ 510 (11 November 2009) Whittle Movers Ltd v Hollywood Express Ltd [2009] [...] [read post]
29 May 2020, 6:55 am by James Goodman
After more than three years of litigation and two rounds of extensive discovery, in Calendar Research LLC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 10:14 am by Venkat Balasubramani
- claims for injunctive relief under consumer protection laws of several states go forward. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:15 am by Robert Botkin
On October 22, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States heard arguments for Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:15 am by Robert Botkin
On October 22, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States heard arguments for Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:49 pm by Mandour & Associates
Patent Trial and Appeal Board made the findings as part of its decision in Microstrategy, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 6:33 pm by Eric
Combined with Rescuecom giving up, Google has now whittled its pending AdWords challenges down to 8 pending cases. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 5:29 pm
From the Fairly Used Blog For background, see Jonathan Pink interviews: District Court Invalidates Portion of Copyright Act as Unconstitutional; Holds State University and Employee Immune From Claim for Copyright Infringement (April 15, 2008) and Follow up questions on state university copyright immunity case - Marketing Information Masters v. [read post]