Search for: "State v. Wines" Results 141 - 160 of 1,021
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2019, 4:30 am by Fox Rothschild LLP and Emily I. Bridges
Supreme Court could impact the wine and spirits market in nearly half the country: The impending ruling from the United States Supreme Court in Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
Caldwell, 10-622 (which had been relisted once), and Wine Country Gift Baskets.com v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 1:58 am
The relevant public by reference to which the absolute ground for refusal must be assessed is the average consumer in the Member State in which the place designated by a GI is situated. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 12:45 pm by admin
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA “The evidence in the record does not compel findings contrary to those made by USCIS. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 1:11 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
  Whites & Reds The second book on this Kat’s list is “Whites & Reds: A history of Wine in the Lands of Tsar and Commissar” by Stephen V. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:55 am
Russian Standard Vodka (USA), Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 7:11 am
Whatever one's thoughts about wine in a box, it is necessary to be fair and objective when considering disputes concerning patents. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 7:40 pm
In brief sampling, starting with the First Circuit, the court summarized the standard in Wine and Spirits Retailers, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 6:15 am
"In Silenus Wines, the CCPA allowed registration of a mark used on imported wine sold intrastate because "were it not for the intrastate sales anticipated by the appellant-importer, the foreign commerce that occurred ... would probably not have occurred - unquestionably a direct effect. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 3:34 am by David Whitehead
Background In 1990, D&D Wines International Ltd contracted to act as both agent and distributor in the UK for Angove, an Australian wine producer. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
., LLC v National Wine & Spirits, Inc., 196 3d 883, the Appellate Division, Third Department, said its "longstanding doctrine of judicial estoppel has been succinctly stated as follows:  Where a party assumes a position in one legal [action or] proceeding and succeeds in maintaining that position, that party may not subsequently assume a contrary position in a second [action or] proceeding because its interests have changed. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
., LLC v National Wine & Spirits, Inc., 196 3d 883, the Appellate Division, Third Department, said its "longstanding doctrine of judicial estoppel has been succinctly stated as follows:  Where a party assumes a position in one legal [action or] proceeding and succeeds in maintaining that position, that party may not subsequently assume a contrary position in a second [action or] proceeding because its interests have changed. [read post]