Search for: "Steele v. Gray" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2013, 5:42 am
Steel Corp., 856 F.2d 514, 521 n.8 (3d Cir. 1988)(observing that a employee cannot generally waive his rights under FLSA, but that he may be able to release a factually disputed claim); Watkins v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by ernst
Gray v Motor Accident Commission (1998): Does the Criminal Punishment of the Defendant Bar Exemplary Damages? [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:28 pm
Steele (1979) 25 Cal.3d 406, 410 (Edwards); see People v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 4:15 am
”The Workers’ Compensation Board ruled that O’Neil had not sustain the underlying injury as the result of “an incident or risk of her employment” and dismissed her application for workers’ compensation benefits.The Appellate Division agreed.In this instance, said the court, O’Neil’s injury did not fall within an exception to the general rule that the accident or injury must have occurred while the individual was "on the job.Although there is a… [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:57 am by INFORRM
There should be “no unnecessary barriers” to the use of justification (McDonald’s Corp v Steel [1995] 3 All ER 615), and a defendant should be able to enjoy “a full opportunity to make good whatever defence he has” (Basham v Gregory (unreported, 21 February 1996 CA) per Lord Bingham MR). [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:57 am by Adam Chandler
After Justice Thomas announced his opinion in United Student Aid Funds yesterday, the Court heard oral argument in New Process Steel v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:27 am by Scott Bomboy
Gray also dismissed the relevance of an earlier case, Elk v. [read post]