Search for: "Steinberg v. US Dept. of Justice"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
” (CPLR 302 [a] [1]; Aybar v US Tires & Wheels of Queens, LLC, 211 Ad 3d 40, 48-49 [2d Dept 2022].) [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:25 am
A separate cause of action for punitive damages is not legally cognizable (see Steinberg v Monasch, 85 AD2d 403, 406 [1st Dept 1982]). [read post]
13 May 2021, 8:11 am
Steinberg v Schnapp, 73 AD3d 171, 176 [1st Dept 2010]). [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:22 am
Justice Schecter acknowledged the existence of case law permitting a defrauded plaintiff to sue a nonsignatory to a contract in “an action at law for damages for their fraud” (quoting Mack v Latta, 178 NY 525 [1904]). [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
In re WTB Properties, Inc., 291 AD2d 566, 737 NYS2d 654 (2d Dept 2002); Matter of Steinberg v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 10:07 am
Steinberg, 170 AD3d 618, 619 [1st Dept 2019], appeal dismissed 33 NY3d 1043 [2019] [the plaintiffs attracted public attention to themselves as investors in start-ups, voluntarily injected themselves into the world of investing through conferences, interviews and a radio broadcast, and sought to establish their reputation as authorities in the field]; Maule v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Hereen, 563 N.W.2d 830, 837 (S.D. 1997) ("waiver of privilege in this case under [statutory physician-patient privilege] is absolute as to an opposing party"); Steinberg v. [read post]
