Search for: "Stephan v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 173
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2015, 10:39 am
Walter, The Abiding Role of State-State Engagement in the Resolution of Investor-State Disputes Omar E. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
* Those new European patent litigation rules: a report on the Oral Hearing on the 17th draft Dr Stephan Dorn (Hogan Lovells Int. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:15 pm
This Kat is grateful to Dr Stephan Dorn (a lawyer with Hogan Lovells Int. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 3:49 pm
United States. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
… Kazemi Estate v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:34 am
The Washington State Supreme Court faced up to its own earlier error, holding in State v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:32 am
Patterson, 315 U.S. 148 (1942), and Stephan v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:24 am
How the Prescription Act applies to property mattersThe Prescription Act 68 of 1969 states that a claim to a debt must be finalised within a specified time limit. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
Law v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:48 am
The case weighs state immunity against human rights enshrined within the Charter.March 18 — Quebec — Kazemi v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 6:30 am
Uriel Sharef, Ulrich Bock, Carlos Sergi, Stephan Signer, Herbert Steffen, Andres Truppel, and Bernd RegendantzCase number: 11-cv-09073 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: December 13, 2011Qualifying Judgment/Order: February 4, 2014 02/24/2014 05/25/2014 2014-14 SEC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 5:23 pm
Related Posts: Taxing Eggs: A Mini-Symposium Taxing Eggs: Introduction to Perez v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 9:17 am
Commissioner Taxing Eggs: Paul Stephan Taxing Eggs: Lisa Milot [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 7:35 am
Commissioner Taxing Eggs: Paul Stephan [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 6:24 am
A case kicking around back them was United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 3:45 am
Take, for example, Alizio v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
Stephan Kinsella argues that copyrights are “grants of monopoly privilege by the state” that allow its holder to petition the courts for redress. [read post]
5 May 2013, 12:15 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:17 pm
The IPKat clearly isn't a NPE (non-playful entity) (c) Stephan Czuratis The authors also found evidence of last-minute transfers and discovered that, 'if a patent asserted in litigation is transferred once, it is likely to be transferred again', a clear signal of the development of an active trading market. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 11:23 pm
I already discussed this in last week's report on a Nokia v. [read post]
