Search for: "Stevens v. Marks"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,530
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
In Glossip v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 4:25 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re looks at Hughes v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:37 am
By Daniel Hart and Bob Stevens Friday, May 11, 2012 marked the one-year anniversary of Georgia’s new Restrictive Covenant Act ("New Act"). [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 3:41 am
Stevens, 529 U.S. 765, 773 (2000). [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm
By the time of Rucho v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:47 pm
., all 32 NFL teams) IP (team trade marks, logos, etc) for baseball caps and other apparel. [read post]
9 May 2017, 12:59 pm
GuestKats and InternKat I BREAKING: Birss J hands down first FRAND decision in Unwired Planet v Huawei I Retromark: a year in trade marks I Can a public domain artwork be registered as a trade mark or would that be contrary to public policy and morality? [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:44 am
Thankfully, for the thousands of European Patent Attorneys carrying out panic-stricken searches through files hastily-retrieved from the archive, it appears with retrospect that Edwards v Cook represents the high-water mark of the English Courts adopting a strict formulaic approach to priority entitlement. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:28 am
In a video for ISCOTUS, Steven Heyman previews tomorrow’s oral arguments in Wood v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 4:00 pm
Doli Pulungan tried in 2007 to export 100 Leupold Mark 4 CQ/T riflescopes ® ® (made in Oregon by Leupold & Stevens, Inc.). [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:05 am
New Hampshire and Gonzalez v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 12:18 pm
See Herrera v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
Writing for this blog, Mark Walsh provided a “view” of the day’s events from the Courtroom. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 7:29 am
Yesterday’s oral arguments in Fisher v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 5:12 am
Fluet, Mark J. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:08 pm
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:12 am
Poly-America, L.P. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 8:32 am
I believe he is referring to passages like this one from Stevens (citations and quotation marks omitted): The First Amendment provides that Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:07 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 2:52 pm
This website examines high profile disputes such as Joyce v Morrissey. [read post]
