Search for: "Stewart v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2023, 4:07 am
" I began to learn that hard lesson when I was a young lawyer at the United States Department of Justice. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 1:47 pm
United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
Revd Paul Williamson in court again In July 1997, the Revd Paul Williamson was made the subject of a Civil Proceedings Order as a vexatious litigant pursuant to s.42(1A) Senior Courts Act 1981 (Restriction of vexatious legal proceedings), primarily as a result of a series of proceedings arising from his opposition to the ordination of women: see R v HM Attorney-General ex parte Reverend Paul Stewart Williamson [1997] EWHC Admin 691. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 4:36 pm
Order No. 39391/2021. 105 Rivista di diritto internazionale 620 (2022) Weihuan Zhou, Turkey – Certain Measures Concerning the Production, Importation and Marketing of Pharmaceutical Products, WT/DS583/ARB25 Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law The United States Agrees to Loss and Damage Fund at COP27 The Treasury Department Implements Security Council Resolution Establishing a Humanitarian Carveout for UN Sanctions … [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:55 am
Unit B 1981). [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 7:27 pm
Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
Canada On 20 March 2023, the Supreme Court of British Columbia ordered the plaintiffs to pay the reasonable costs of the defendant on a full indemnity basis, in the case of Mawhinney v Stewart, 2023 BCSC 419, [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
The plaintiff in Gonzalez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 11:57 am
District Court judge authorizing the use of a geofence warrant in the Jan. 6 prosecution case United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:38 am
It is extremely difficult to square the state bar’s version with what the prosecutor said, as recounted in Miller v Pate. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Those challenges have alleged that Black defendants are more likely than White defendants to get death sentences, even when they commit comparable crimes.In 1972, the United States Supreme Court’s Furman v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
On the same day, Chamberlain J heard an application in the case of VLM v LPB. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
” The facts of Irvin v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:57 am
I described then the legal landscape in which their motions to transfer venue are playing out, which is largely set by the District of Columbia Circuit’s binding, en banc 1976 ruling in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:34 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
In Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:07 am
Stewart, reviewing Lex Pacificatoria, Jus Post Bellum, or Just “Good Practice”? [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Copies of The Federalist were often shipped abroad by the United States Government. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:55 pm
And, just to show that our foray into cyberlaw was no fluke, Gus and I also predict that the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is going to strike down the Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act, also known as FOSTA-SESTA – the legislative exception to Section 230 that civil society loves to hate. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 11:21 am
During that time, the court decided some major cases involving abortion, religious liberty, the president of the United States, student speech, the Second Amendment, and LGBTQ rights. [read post]
